https://admin.imcjms.com/ Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science Sabiha Tamboli*Kananbala Yelikar https://admin.imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/602 2026-05-11 10:54:18 Original Article January 2026; Vol. 20(1):007 60 years (4.54%), followed by the 41-60 years age group (2.58%). No positive cases were detected among children <12 years. Prevalence was nearly equal among males (2.0%) and females (1.26%). Month-wise analysis showed a fluctuating trend, with the highest positivity in April (2.03%). The highest HBsAg rate was observed among suspected hepatitis cases 2.50%, followed by Preoperative screening 1.64%. Conclusion: The study highlights a low prevalence of HBsAg in our hospital population, consistent with WHO’s “low endemicity” category. The absence of infections in children reflects the success of childhood vaccination programs, while persistence in adults suggests the need for catch-up vaccination strategies. Comparisons with similar studies confirm declining HBV prevalence across India. Strengthened surveillance, improved diagnostic confirmation and targeted immunization remain critical for achieving HBV elimination goals. January 2026; Vol. 20(1):007.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.55010/imcjms.20.007 *Correspondence: Sabiha Tamboli, Department of Microbiology, ASPL’S CSMSS Medical College and Hospital, Limbejalgaon, Chatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India. Email: sabihatamboli77@gmail.com. © 2026 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC BY 4.0).   Introduction Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continues to pose a global health burden, affecting both developed and developing nations. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), an estimated 296 million people were living with chronic HBV infection in 2022, resulting in nearly 820,000 deaths annually from cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [1]. HBV is considered highly infectious, with transmission rates significantly higher than HIV and remains a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality [2]. The epidemiology of HBV varies geographically. Based on HBsAg prevalence, WHO categorizes regions as low (<2%), intermediate (2–7%), and high (>8%) endemicity [3]. Countries in sub-Saharan Africa and East Asia report high prevalence, while Europe and North America fall into low prevalence zones. India represents an intermediate-endemic country, with earlier reports estimating an average prevalence of 2–8%, though significant difference exists among different states and communities [4,5]. Meta-analyses suggest that while rural and tribal populations exhibit higher prevalence, urban areas often show lower values due to improved healthcare access and immunization [6]. The introduction of hepatitis B vaccination has significantly altered prevalence rates globally. Nations such as Taiwan and South Korea have demonstrated remarkable declines in HBV prevalence following universal vaccination, with reductions to <1% among younger populations [7,8]. In India, the vaccine was introduced into the Universal Immunization Program (UIP) in 2002 in selected states and expanded nationally by 2011 [9]. Studies now indicate reduced prevalence in children and adolescents, though adult cohorts remain affected due to lack of vaccination during earlier decades [10]. Diagnosis of HBV infection relies on detection of specific viral antigens and antibodies. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), which appears in the serum 1–10 weeks after exposure and indicates both acute and chronic infection. Chronic infection is defined as persistent HBsAg for >6 months [11]. Its detection is essential for blood donor screening, antenatal care, preoperative evaluation and hospital admissions. While enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIA) remain the gold standard due to higher sensitivity and specificity, rapid immunochromatographic tests (ICTs) are extensively employed in resource-limited healthcare facilities [12]. Diagnostic accuracy varies: ELISA sensitivity 98-100% and specificity 99-100%; CLIA sensitivity /specificity 99-100%; ICT sensitivity 60-98% and specificity 90-99%. These tests provide quick results, are cost-effective and require minimal technical expertise, making them highly suitable for routine hospital-based screening. In India, several studies have reported variable prevalence of HBsAg depending on geography, socioeconomic factors, vaccination coverage, and study population [13–15]. The present study was undertaken to estimate the prevalence of HBsAg among patients attending a tertiary care hospital over six months, to analyse the influence of age and gender, to observe monthly variations and to compare findings with other published studies.   Materials and methods This was a prospective, hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted at CSMSS Medical College and Hospital, Limbejalgaon, Maharashtra, India, in the Department of Microbiology, over a six-month period from January 2025 to June 2025. The majority of patients attending this tertiary care hospital belong to lower and middle socio-economic strata from rural area. Prior to initiation, the study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC). Confidentiality of patient information was strictly maintained and test results were reported only to treating physicians. A total of 3,200 blood samples were collected from patients attending both outpatient and inpatient departments. Samples included those requested for preoperative screening, antenatal check-up, general medical evaluation and suspected cases of hepatitis. Hemolyzed and inadequate samples were excluded from the study. Vaccination history was not consistently available in medical records. Serum samples were screened for HBsAg using a commercially available rapid immunochromatographic test (ICT) kit (Erba HBsAg Rapid test Transasia Biomedicals Ltd, Mumbai Maharashtra India). Manufacturer’s instructions were strictly followed. According to the manufacturer, sensitivity and specificity of the kit were 99.8% and 99.7%, respectively. Each test included built-in control lines and additional internal positive and negative controls were run periodically for quality assurance. Patients of all age groups and both genders tested for HBsAg. Repeat samples from the same patient within the study period were excluded. Data were categorized by age, gender and month of collection. Results were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Lack of ELISA/ CLIA confirmation is acknowledged as a limitation. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square testing, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.   Results Out of 3200 samples screened during the six-month period, 53 were positive for HBsAg, yielding an overall prevalence rate of 1.65%.   Table-1: The distribution of HBsAg positivity across age groups     Table-2: Gender-wise distribution of HBsAg positivity     Table-3: Month-wise distribution of HBsAg positivity     Table-4: The distribution of HBsAg positivity according to study group     Table-5: Age and sex distribution of HBsAg positive cases according to study group     Discussion The present hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted over six months demonstrated an overall HBsAg prevalence of 1.65% among 3,200 patients. This prevalence places our study population within the low endemicity zone, as per WHO classification (<2%) [3]. Our findings are similar to several recent studies in India that have reported a declining trend in HBV prevalence. For instance, Chowdhury et al. [16] in West Bengal documented a prevalence of 1.2%, while Singh et al. [17] in Uttar Pradesh reported 1.5%. Similarly, a meta-analysis by Batham et al. [6] concluded that the pooled prevalence in India is approximately 1.5–2%. This indicates encouraging progress toward HBV elimination targets set for 2030. In our study, prevalence was highest among individuals above 60 years (4.54%), whereas no positive cases were observed in children <12 years. The absence of infections among younger children likely reflects the impact of universal immunization programs introduced over the last two decades [9]. Similar age-related patterns have been reported in studies from Tamil Nadu [18] and Maharashtra [19], where vaccination was associated with significant reductions in paediatric prevalence. On the other hand, higher prevalence among older adults is attributable to infection acquired prior to the introduction of vaccination, as well as long-term persistence in chronically infected carriers. We observed nearly equal prevalence among males (2.0%) and females (1.26%). While some studies have reported a higher prevalence among males, possibly due to occupational exposure, risk behaviours or healthcare-seeking patterns [20] others have found no significant gender differences [21]. Our findings suggest that gender is not a major determinant in this population. Within each study group, preoperative screening cases showed higher positivity among middle aged males (21-60 years). All antenatal positive cases belonged to 21-40 years age group, consistent with reproductive age profile. General medicine evaluation cases were distributed across adult age groups with higher positivity among male. Suspected hepatitis cases show higher positivity among males, particularly in the 21-60 years age group. No positive case was detected in children (<12 years). (Table-5) A fluctuating monthly trend was observed, with the highest positivity recorded in April (2.03%). Such variations may be incidental or influenced by seasonal differences in hospital admissions, referral patterns and healthcare access. Similar fluctuations were noted by Ramesh et al. [22] in Karnataka. Our prevalence (1.65%) is consistent with reports from several low-prevalence regions such as the United States (<1%) [23] and European countries (<2%) [24]. However, it remains far below the rates documented in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Southeast Asia, where prevalence ranges from 5–10% [25]. This disparity emphasizes the need for region-specific public health strategies. The absence of HBsAg positivity among children underscores the success of India’s childhood vaccination strategy. Despite that, the persistence of infection among adults highlights the necessity of catch-up vaccination programs targeting unvaccinated adolescents and adults. Further, pregnant women remain a critical group for screening, given the risk of mother-to-child transmission [26]. When analyzed according to study groups, the highest HBsAg rate was observed among suspected hepatitis cases 2.50%, followed by preoperative screening 1.64% and antenatal cases 1.55%. General evaluation group showed the lowest rate 1.37%. highest positivity due to clinical presentation while lower rate in ANC is due to routine surveillance findings. Although ICT kits are useful for rapid screening, they may lack the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA and CLIA [12]. False negatives can occur in cases of low antigenemia, while false positives may arise from cross-reactivity. Hence, confirmatory testing is recommended, particularly for blood donor screening and antenatal care. The strength of this study lies in its sizeable sample size and detailed subgroup analysis. However, the reliance on ICT alone and the single-centre hospital-based nature limit generalizability. Future studies should incorporate confirmatory assays and molecular testing such as HBV DNA PCR for better accuracy.   Conclusion The present study revealed a low prevalence (1.65%) of HBsAg among hospital patients in our region reflecting progress in HBV control measures. The results indicate significant progress in HBV control, particularly the absence of infection in children, reflecting the impact of vaccination programs. However, higher prevalence in older adults underscores the need for catch-up vaccination, routine screening and confirmatory testing to support HBV elimination goals. Rapid ICT-based screening remains valuable in resource-limited hospitals but should ideally be complemented by confirmatory methods. Sustained public health strategies, enhanced awareness, and universal vaccination are key to achieving WHO’s target of eliminating viral hepatitis as a public health threat by 2030.   Source of funding None   Conflict of interest None of the authors has any conflict of interest   References 1.     World Health Organization. Global Hepatitis Report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. 2.     Shepard CW, Simard EP, Finelli L, Fiore AE, Bell BP. Hepatitis B virus infection: epidemiology and vaccination. Epidemiol Rev. 2006; 28: 112-125. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxj009. 3.     World Health Organization. Hepatitis B fact sheet. Updated 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ hepatitis-b [Accessed in July 2025] 4.     Lodha R, Jain Y, Anand K, Kabra SK, Pandav CS. Hepatitis B in India: a review of disease epidemiology. Indian Pediatr. 2001; 38(4): 349-371. 5.     Tandon BN, Acharya SK, Tandon A. Epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in India. Gut. 1996; 38 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): S56-S59. doi:10.1136/gut.38.suppl_2.s56. 6.     Batham A, Narula D, Toteja T, Sreenivas V, Puliyel JM. Sytematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of hepatitis B in India. Indian Pediatr. 2007; 44(9): 663-674. 7.     Chen DS. Hepatitis B vaccination: The key towards elimination and eradication of hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2009; 50(4): 805-816. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2009.01.002. 8.     Park NH, Chung YH, Lee HS. Impacts of vaccination on hepatitis B viral infections in Korea over a 25-year period. Intervirology. 2010; 53(1): 20-28. doi:10.1159/000252780. 9.     Government of India. Universal Immunization Program guidelines. 2011. Available from: https://main.mohfw.gov.in. 10.  Debnath A, Yadav A, Lahariya C. Vaccine-preventable diseases in pediatric age group in India: recent resurgence, implications and solutions. Indian J Pediatr. 2025; 92(7): 733-741. doi:10.1007/s12098-025-05531-9 11.  Ganem D, Prince AM. Hepatitis B virus infection--natural history and clinical consequences. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(11): 1118-1129. doi:10.1056/NEJMra031087. 12.  Shivkumar S, Peeling R, Jafari Y, Joseph L, Pai NP. Rapid point-of-care first-line screening tests for hepatitis B infection: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy (1980-2010). Am J Gastroenterol. 2012; 107(9): 1306-1313. doi:10.1038/ajg.2012.141. 13.  Kumar D, Peter RM, Joseph A, Kosalram K, Kaur H. Prevalence of viral hepatitis infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Educ Health Promot. 2023; 12: 103. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1005_22. 14.  Afroz Z, Ray B. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses among patients in a tertiary care hospital of North India: A hospital based retrospective study. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol Pharma Res. 2023; 12(2): 1462-1468. 15.  Murhekar MV, Kumar MS, Kamaraj P, Khan SA, Allam RR, Barde P, et al. Hepatitis-B virus infection in India: Findings from a nationally representative serosurvey, 2017-18. Int J Infect Dis. 2020; 100: 455-460. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.084. 16.  Sood S, Malvankar S. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen, antibodies to the hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus in a hospital-based population in Jaipur, Rajasthan. Indian J Community Med. 2010; 35(1): 165-9. doi:10.4103/0970-0218.62588. 17.  Goel V, Singh K, Mohan S, Bansal J. Seroprevalence and coinfection of hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses in Western Uttar Pradesh: a tertiary care hospital-based study. Int J Health Sci Res. 2026; 16(2): 94-98. doi:10.52403/ijhsr.20260213. 18.  Gopinath R, Sundaram ALM, Dhanasezhian A, Arundadhi M, Thangam GS. Seroprevalence of various viral diseases in Tamil Nadu, India. J Glob Infect Dis. 2023; 15(4): 144-148. doi:10.4103/jgid.jgid_101_23. 19.  Swaroop S, Shalimar, Acharya SK. Hepatitis B virus prevalence in India: A wake-up call for action. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025; 44(5): 585-587. doi:10.1007/s12664-025-01804-5. 20.  Bhattacharya H, Parai D, Sahoo SK, Swain A, Pattnaik M, Mohapatra I, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection among the tribal and particularly vulnerable tribal population from an eastern state of India: Findings from the serosurvey in seven tribal dominated districts, 2021-2022. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14: 1039696. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1039696. 21.  Chowdhury A, Santra A, Chakravorty R, Banerji A, Pal S, Dhali GK, et al. Community-based epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in West Bengal, India: prevalence of hepatitis B e antigen-negative infection and associated viral variants. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 20(11): 1712-1720. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.04070.x. 22.  Hanamaraddi D, SK A, Kulkarni RD, GS A, Shetty P, Hosamani M, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B infection at a tertiary care hospital in North Karnataka over a period of 10 years. Int J Environ Sci. 2025; 11(7s): 419-423. doi:10.64252/m7vymy15. 23.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hepatitis B surveillance—United States, 2021. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/statistics/index.htm 24.  European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Hepatitis B epidemiology in Europe. Stockholm: ECDC; 2020. 25.  Ott JJ, Stevens GA, Groeger J, Wiersma ST. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection: new estimates of age-specific HBsAg seroprevalence and endemicity. Vaccine. 2012; 30(12): 2212-2219. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.116. 26.  World Health Organization. Guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, care and treatment for people with chronic hepatitis B infection. 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240090903.   Cite this article as: Tamboli S, Yelikar K. Seroprevalence of Hepatitis B surface antigen in a tertiary care setting in Maharashtra, India: clinical and public health impact. IMC J Med Sci. 2026; 20(1):007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55010/imcjms.20.007.]]> 2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.